Эктопическая беременность редкой локализации: шеечной и в рубце после кесарева сечения

1. Po L., Thomas J., Mills K., Zakhari A., Tulandi T., Shuman M. et al. Guideline No. 414: management of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2021; 43(5): 614-630.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2021.01.002.
2. Baggio S., Garzon S., Russo A., Ianniciello C.Q., Santi L., Laganà A.S. et al. Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021; 303(1): 259-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2.
3. Mullany K., Minneci M., Monjazeb R., C Coiado O. Overview of ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, management, and innovation. Womens Health (Lond.). 2023; 19: 17455057231160349. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455057231160349.
4. Chong K.Y., Solangon S., Barnhart K., Causa-Andrieu P., Capmas P., Condous G. et al.; International Collaboration on Core Outcomes in Ectopic Pregnancy. A core outcome set for future research in ectopic pregnancy: an international consensus development study. Fertil. Steril. 2023; 119(5): 804-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.042.
5. Chouinard M., Mayrand M.H., Ayoub A., Healy-Profitós J., Auger N. Ectopic pregnancy and outcomes of future intrauterine pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 2019; 112(1): 112-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.019.
6. Roitman M.S., Wainstock T., Sheiner E., Leibson T., Pariente G. Ectopic pregnancy: perinatal outcomes of future gestations and long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021; 304(3): 633-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05991-2.
7. Jin X., Liu M., Zhang P., Zheng L., Qi F. Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 337. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05584-8.
8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins - Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: tubal ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 131(3): e91-e103. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002560.
9. Hendriks E., Rosenberg R., Prine L. Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Physician. 2020; 101(10): 599-606.
10. Maleki A., Khalid N., Rajesh Patel C., El-Mahdi E. The rising incidence of heterotopic pregnancy: current perspectives and associations with in-vitro fertilization. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021; 266: 138-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.031.
11. Ucisik-Keser F.E., Matta E.J., Fabrega M.G., Chandrasekhar C., Chua S.S. The many faces of ectopic pregnancies: demystifying the common and less common entities. Abdom. Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(3): 1104-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02681-6.
12. Brady P.C. New evidence to guide ectopic pregnancy diagnosis and management. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2017; 72(10): 618-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000492.
13. Naik S., Kumar S., Rani A., Patil S., Voorkara U., Kamath V.S. Interventional challenges in non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. J. Family Reprod. Health. 2022; 16(1): 78-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v16i1.8597.
14. Cheng L.Y., Lin P.Y., Huang F.J., Kung F.T., Chiang H.J., Lin Y.J. et al. Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: a single-center experience during 15 years. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 54(5): 541-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.004.
15. Houser M., Kandalaft N., Khati N.J. Ectopic pregnancy: a resident's guide to imaging findings and diagnostic pitfalls. Emerg. Radiol. 2022; 29(1): 161-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-01974-7.
16. Silva B., Viana Pinto P., Costa M.A. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review on expectant management. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2023; 288: 36-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030.
17. Kostroun K., Go V.A., Robinson R.D. An update and review of nontubal ectopic pregnancy management. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023; 35(4): 279-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000893.
18. Stabile G., Mangino F.P., Romano F., Zinicola G., Ricci G. Ectopic cervical pregnancy: treatment route. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(6): 293. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060293.
19. Maglic R., Rakic A., Nikolic B., Maglic D., Jokanovic P., Mihajlovic S. Management of cervical ectopic pregnancy with small-caliber hysteroscopy. JSLS. 2021; 25(2): e2021.00016. https://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00016.
20. Guo E.J., Chung J.P.W., Poon L.C.Y., Li T.C. Reproductive outcomes after surgical treatment of Asherman syndrome: a systematic review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019; 59: 98-114. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.12.009.
21. Roche C., McDonnell R., Tucker P., Jones K., Milward K., McElhinney B. et al. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: evolution from medical to surgical management. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020; 60(6): 852-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13241.
22. Jordans I.P.M., Verberkt C., De Leeuw R.A., Bilardo C.M., Van Den Bosch T., Bourne T. et al. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 59(4): 437-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24815.
23. Doroszewska K., Milewicz T., Bereza T., Horbaczewska A., Komenda J., Kłosowicz E. et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy - various methods of treatment. Folia Med. Cracov. 2019; 59(2): 5-14.
24. Tang Q., Qin Y., Zhou Q., Tang J., Zhou Q., Qiao J. et al. Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116(6): 1559-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.015.
25. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Calì G., D'Antonio F., Kaelin Agten A. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis and pathogenesis. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2019; 46(4): 797-811. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.07.009.
26. Сонова М.М., Гашенко В.О., Ласкевич А.В., Торубаров С.Ф. Эктопическая беременность в рубце после кесарева сечения. Проблемы репродукции. 2018; 24(1): 42-7.
27. Yang X., Zheng W., Zhang H., Wei X., Yan J., Yang H. Expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancy in 13 patients. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2022; 35(25): 8066-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1940942.
28. Sokalska A., Rambhatla A., Dudley C., Bhagavath B. Nontubal ectopic pregnancies: overview of diagnosis and treatment. Fertil. Steril. 2023;120(3 Pt. 2): 553-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.014.
29. Calí G., Timor-Tritsch I.E., Forlani F., Palacios-Jaraquemada J., Monteagudo A., Kaelin Agten A. et al. Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 55(4): 450-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21939.
30. Hoffman T., Lin J. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with ultrasound. Clin. Pract. Cases Emerg. Med. 2020; 4(1): 65-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2019.10.43988.
31. Rasheedy R., Sammour H., Elkholy A., Fadel E. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 48(10): 827-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.013.
32. Noël L., Thilaganathan B. Caesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, natural history and treatment. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 34(5): 279-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000808.
33. Xiao C., Shi Q., Cheng Q., Xu J. Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(50): e27851. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027851.
34. Huo S., Shen L., Ju Y., Liu K., Liu W. Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: 11-year experience at a medical center. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023; 36(1): 2162818. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2162818.
35. Stabile G., Zinicola G., Romano F., Buonomo F., Mangino F.P., Ricci G. Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a single center experience. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(9): 652. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090652.
36. Yamaguchi M., Ohba T., Katabuchi H. Safety and efficacy of a single local methotrexate injection for cesarean scar pregnancy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2022; 29(3): 416-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.11.008.
37. Tanos V., ElAkhras S., Kaya B. Hysteroscopic management of cervical pregnancy: case series and review of the literature. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 48(4): 247-53. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.05.001.
38. Masten M., Alston M. Treatment of recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy with oral mifepristone, systemic methotrexate, and ultrasound-guided suction dilation and curettage. Cureus. 2023; 15(3): e36200. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36200.
39. Diakosavvas M., Kathopoulis N., Angelou K., Chatzipapas I., Zacharakis D., Kypriotis K. et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022; 270: 42-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.12.038.
40. Casadio P., Ambrosio M., Verrelli L., Salucci P., Arena A., Seracchioli R. Conservative cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: local methotrexate injection followed by hysteroscopic removal with hysteroscopic tissue removal system. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116(5): 1417-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.034.
41. Zhu W., Zhang X., Liu C., Liu Y., Xu W. Uterine artery embolization on serum β-HCG levels, fertility function and clinical efficacy in patients with cesarean uterine scar pregnancy. Front. Surg. 2022; 9: 838879. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.838879.
42. Давыдов А.И., Рубина Е.В., Пашков В.М., Шахламова М.Н. Редкие формы внематочной беременности: методология и отдаленные результаты лечения. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2019; 18(2): 69-75.
43. Imai K., Fukushi Y., Nishimura M., Ohara Y., Suzuki Y., Ota H. et al. Combination of conservative treatment and temporary bilateral laparoscopic uterine artery clipping with hysteroscopic transcervical resection for cervical pregnancy: a retrospective study. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 50(4): 101735. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101735.
44. Cao L., Qian Z., Huang L. Comparison of D&C and hysteroscopy after UAE in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(3): e28607. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028607.
45. Fowler M.L., Wang D., Chia V., Handal-Orefice R., Latortue-Albino P., Mulekar S. et al. Management of cervical ectopic pregnancies: a scoping review. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 138(1): 33-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004423.
46. Marchand G.J., Masoud A.T., Coriell C., Ulibarri H., Parise J., Arroyo A. et al. Treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in China with uterine artery embolization - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 11(24): 7393. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247393.
47. Long Y., Zhu H., Hu Y., Shen L., Fu J., Huang W. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020; 7(7): CD011174. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011174.pub2.

Поступила 09.10.2024

Принята в печать 29.10.2024