Реконструктивно-пластические операции на тазовом дне в лечении пролапса и нарушений функции тазовых органов

1. Данилина О.А., Волков В.Г. Распространенность пролапса тазовых органов среди женщин репродуктивного возраста. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2022; 29(1): 29-33
2. Артымук Н.В., Хапачева С.Ю. Распространенность симптомов дисфункции тазового дна у женщин репродуктивного возраста. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 9: 99-105
3. Padoa A., Braga A., Brecher S., Fligelman T., Mesiano G., Serati M. Pelvic organ prolapse: current challenges and future perspectives. J. Clin. Med. 2025; 14(20): 7313. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207313
4. Naumann G. Quo Vadis Urogynecology 2020 – Innovative treatment concepts for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021; 81(2): 183-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1302-7803
5. de Tayrac R., Antosh D.D., Baessler K., Cheon C., Deffieux X., Gutman R. et al. Summary: 2021 International consultation on incontinence evidence-based surgical pathway for pelvic organ prolapse. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 11(20): 6106. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206106
6. Serati M., Braga A., Cantaluppi S., Caccia G., Ghezzi F., Sorice P. Vaginal cystocele repair and hysteropexy in women with anterior and central compartment prolapse: efficacy and safety after 30 months of follow-up. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2018; 29(6): 831-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3498-x
7. Hoke T.P., Tan-Kim J., Richter H.E. Evidence-based review of vaginal native tissue hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2019; 74(7): 429-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000686
8. de Oliveira S.A., Fonseca M.C.M., Bortolini M.A.T., Girão M.J.B.C., Roque M.T., Castro R.A. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017; 28(11): 1617-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1
9. Maeda A., Tobu S., Kawasaki M., Kakinoki H., Noguchi M. The efficacy and safety of colpocleisis for urinary retention in elderly women with pelvic organ prolapse. Cureus. 2025; 17(12): e98680. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98680
10. Lv A., Gai T., Zhang S., Feng Q., Li Y. Electrical stimulation plus biofeedback improves urination function, pelvic floor function, and distress after reconstructive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2023; 38(1): 226. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04513-7
11. Черёмин М.М., Смольнова Т.Ю., Чупрынин В.Д., Чурсин В.В., Мельников М.В. Место влагалищной сакроспинальной фиксации в хирургическом лечении пролапса гениталий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 8: 14-21
12. Lin F.C., Gilleran J.P., Powell C.R., Atiemo H.O. To mesh or not mesh "apical prolapse," that is the question! Neurourol. Urodyn. 2024; 43(7): 1626-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.25469
13. Dabica A., Balint O., Olaru F., Secosan C., B.alulescu L., Brasoveanu S. et al. Complications of pelvic prolapse surgery using mesh: a systematic review. J. Pers. Med. 2024; 14(6): 622. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm14060622
14. Aleksandrov A., Smith A.V., Rabischong B., Botchorishvili R. Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2021; 13(2): 179-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.13.2.013
15. Wang R., Reagan K., Boyd S., Tulikangas P. Sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia: cohort study of long-term outcomes and complications. BJOG. 2022; 129(9): 1600-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17107
16. Matak L., Baekelandt J., Šimičević M., Matak M., Mikuš M., Orešković S. Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Arch. Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 309(6): 2395-400. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07531-0
17. Kale A., Biler A., Terzi H., Usta T., Kale E. Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2017; 43(5): 903-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0070
18. Никитин Н.И., Аллаярова В.Ф. Латеральная суспензия матки как альтернативный способ лечения пролапса гениталий у женщин репродуктивного возраста. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2019; 14(5): 48-50.
19. Yeung E., Baessler K., Christmann-Schmid C., Haya N., Chen Z., Wallace S.A. et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2024; 3(3): CD012079. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012079.pub2
20. Li S., Chen Y., Mei L., Niu X. Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh in younger women: a retrospective study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2025 Dec 27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06456-9
21. Камоева С.В., Маковская Д.С., Доброхотова Ю.Э. Хирургическая коррекция пролапса тазовых органов у женщин с использованием сетчатых эндопротезов на основе титанового «шелка»: результаты 5-летнего наблюдения. РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2024; 7(3): 227-35
22. Dykes N., Karmakar D., Hayward L. Lightweight transvaginal mesh is associated with lower mesh exposure rates than heavyweight mesh. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020; 31(9): 1785-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04270-z
23. Ren J., Murray R., Wong C.S., Qin J., Chen M., Totsika M. et al. Development of 3D printed biodegradable mesh with antimicrobial properties for pelvic organ prolapse. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(4): 763. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14040763
24. Шкарупа Д.Д., Шахалиев Р.А., Шульгин А.С., Филипенко Т.С., Кубин Н.Д., Лабетов И.А. Сравнение патоморфологических свойств нерезорбируемого и частично резорбируемых имплантов для реконструктивной хирургии пролапса тазовых органов и стрессового недержания мочи: экспериментальное исследование. Вестник урологии. 2024; 12(5): 63-73
25. Буштырева И.О., Чернобабова Т.В., Боронтов В.Г., Антимирова В.В., Бабич Е.С. Пролапс гениталий. Оценка эффективности различных методов хирургической коррекции. Главврач Юга России. 2017; 3(56): 22-7
26. Wu Y.H., Jiang Y.H., Chen S.F., Kuo H.C. Comparison of the long-term treatment outcome between pubovaginal and transobturator suburethral sling for stress urinary incontinence in women. Int. Neurourol. J. 2025; 29(4): 248-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.2550078.039
27. Abdel-Fattah M., Cooper D., Davidson T., Kilonzo M., Boyers D., Bhal K. et al. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: the SIMS RCT. Health Technol. Assess. 2022; 26(47): 1-190. https://dx.doi.org/10.3310/BTSA6148
28. Huang Y.K., Fan Y.H., Lin A.T., Huang W.J., Lin C.C. Enhancing the autologous fascial sling procedure: a novel fixation method for treating stress urinary incontinence in female patients. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2024; 87(10): 940-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001141
29. Handa V.L., Roem J., Blomquist J.L., Dietz H.P., Muñoz A. Pelvic organ prolapse as a function of levator ani avulsion, hiatus size, and strength. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 221(1): 41.e1-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.004
30. Wang K., Li F., Li Q., Wei L., Zhou Y., Cao Y. et al. Transvaginal posterior levatorplasty combined with perineoplasty: an effective surgical method for vaginal rejuvenation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2024; 154(5): 874e-84e. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011023
31. Guzman-Negron J.M., Fascelli M., Vasavada S.P. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse: suture-based repair. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2019; 46(1): 79-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.007
32. Wihersaari O., Karjalainen P., Tolppanen A.M., Mattsson N., Nieminen K., Jalkanen J. Sexual activity and dyspareunia after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a 5-Year nationwide follow-up study. Eur. Urol. Open Sci. 2022; 45: 81-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.014
33. Mowat A., Maher D., Baessler K., Christmann-Schmid C., Haya N., Maher C. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 3(3): CD012975. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012975
34. Кузнецов В.В., Глухов Е.Ю., Хизадзе А.Г., Куркова Т.Ф. Способ хирургической коррекции недостаточности мышц тазового дна. Патент РФ № 2 830 200 С1 от 25.01.2024. Опубл. 14.11.2024. Изобретения. Полезные модели. Бюл. № 32
35. Xu Y., Wei L., Liu M., Jia Z., Li Y., Li F. Transvaginal posterior levatorplasty and perineoplasty for female primary stress urinary incontinence: 12-month follow-up and technical presentation. BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1): 235. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01604-7
36. Shi W., Guo L. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023; 43(1): 2160929. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2160929
37. Guérin S., Suzman E., Alhalabi F., Lutz K., Zimmern P. Very long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair. J. Robot. Surg. 2024; 19(1): 25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02185-1
38. Nüssler E., Granåsen G., Bixo M., Löfgren M. Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse – a national register-based cohort study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(7): 1863-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05156-y
39. Cruz Villamarín P.A., Bustillos Solorzano M.E. Impact of pelvic floor reconstruction surgery on the quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Ciencia Digital. 2024; 8(4): 92-114. https://dx.doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v8i4.3273
40. Ghanbari Z., Ghaemi M., Shafiee A., Jelodarian P., Hosseini R.S., Pouyamoghaddam S. et al. Quality of life following pelvic organ prolapse treatments in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 11(23): 7166. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237166

Поступила 16.01.2026

Принята в печать 05.02.2026