Истонченный рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: оценка факторов риска

1. Алиева Э.Н., Кулбаева С.Н. Кесарево сечение – резервы снижения частоты. Вестник Казахского национального медицинского университета. 2015; 4: 5-6.
2. Гурьев Д.Л., Охапкин М.Б., Гурьева М.С., Кабанов И.В., Гурьева Д.Д., Асадова С.А. Снижение частоты кесарева сечения и перинатальных потерь в стационаре уровня 3А с использованием классификации Робсона. Доктор.Ру. 2019; 4: 8-13.
3. Gubbini G., Casadio P., Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15(2): 172-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.004.
4. Osser O.V., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 34(1): 90-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6395.
5. Luo L., Niu G., Wang Q., Xie H.Z., Yao S.Z. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19(4): 454-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.012.
6. Van der Voet L.F., Bij de Vaate A.M., Veersema S., Brölmann H.A.M., Huirne J.A. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014; 121(2): 236-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12542.
7. Abalos E., Oyarzun E., Addo V., Sharma J.B., Matthews J., Oyieke J. et al. CORONIS Collaborative Group. CORONIS – International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 215. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-215.
8. Wang C.J., Huang H.J., Chao A., Lin Y.P., Pan Y.J., Horng S.G. Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011; 154(2): 218-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.016.
9. Parra-Herran C., Djordjevic B. Histopathology of placenta creta: chorionic villi intrusion into myometrial vascular spaces and extravillous trophoblast proliferation are frequent and specific findings with implications for diagnosis and pathogenesis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2016; 35(6): 497-508. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pgp.0000000000000250.
10. Tang X., Wang J., Du Y., Xie M., Zhang H., Xu H. et al. Caesarean scar defect: risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019: 242: 1-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.001.
11. Park I.Y., Kim M.R., Lee H.N., Gen Y., Kim M.J. Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 162. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1821-2.
12. Nezhat C., Grace L., Soliemannjad R., Razavi G.M., Nezhat A. Cesarean scar defect: what is it and how should it be treated? OBG Management. 2016; 28(4): 32, 34, 36, 38-39, 53.
13. Dodd J.M., Anderson E.R., Gates S., Grivell R.M. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; (7): CD004732. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.
14. Ананьев В.А. Результаты кесарева сечения при наложении однорядного и двухрядного шва на матку. Акушерство и гинекология. 2000; 4: 26-9.
15. Гребенкин Б.Е., Заплатина В.С., Беда Ю.В. Кесарево сечение в современных условиях. Практическая медицина. 2009; 2: 72-6.
16. Naji O., Abdallah Y., Bij de Vaate A.J., Smith A., Pexsters A., Stalder C. et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 39(3): 252-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.10077.
17. Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J. et al. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 31(1): 72-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200.
18. Vikhareva Osser O., Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG. 2010; 117(9): 1119-26.https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x.
19. Stegwee S.I., Jordans I.P.M., van der Voet L.F., Bongers M.Y., de Groot C.J.M., Lambalk C.B. et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2 Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1): 85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2221-y.
20. Vervoort A.J.M.W., Uittenbogaard L.B., Hehenkamp W.J.K., Brölmann H.A., Mol B.W., Huirne J.A. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 30(12): 2695-702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev240.
21. Стрижаков А.Н., Тимохина Т.Ф., Баев О.Р., Рыбин М.В., Христофорова А.В. Модификация кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 1997; 5: 33-7.
22. Малышева А.А., Матухин В.И., Резник В.А., Рухляда Н.Н., Тайц А.Н. Опыт оперативной коррекции несостоятельности рубца на матке после операции кесарева сечения на этапе предгравидарной подготовки. Проблемы репродукции. 2018; 24(6): 46-50.
23. Durnwald C., Mercer B. Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(4): 925-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01056-1.

Поступила 19.06.2020

Принята в печать 24.11.2020