Clinical and morphological features of nodular and diffuse adenomyosis

Dzhamalutdinova K.M., Kozachenko I.F., Shchegolev A.I., Faizullina N.M., Adamyan L.V.

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia
Objective. To enhance the efficiency of diagnosis and surgical treatment in patients with nodular and diffuse adenomyosis, by investiating the expression of stem cell markers in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium.
Subjects and methods. A total of 150 women aged 18 to 55 years with diffuse and nodular forms of adenomyosis were examined and surgically treated. Their intraoperative material underwent histological and immunohistochemical examinations. The expression of the stem cell markers Musashi-1, COX-2, and Oct4 markers was investigated.
Results. Organ-sparing surgery was performed in 91 out of the 150 examinees; the others underwent radical surgery. The mean nodular size in adenomyosis was 3.85±2.20 cm. In the nodular form, the nodules were mainly located along the posterior (55.1%) and anterior (38.6%) uterine walls and in the area of its fundus (13.5%). Immunohistochemical analysis of the tussues of the endometrium and adenomyosis revealed that a positive reaction for Musashi-1 was observed in both the nuclei and cytoplasm of glandular and stromal cells. There was a cytoplasmic reaction for COX-2. A positive immunohistochemical reaction for OCT4 was seen in the nuclei of epithelial and stromal cells.
Conclusion. Our findings may suggest that the major components in the development of adenomyosis are a weakened or damaged connective tissue area and the activation of different properties of stem cells in the eutopic endometrium, which manifested, in particular, as overexpression of stem cell markers. The results of our investigation and the data available in the literature can partially explain the lack of effects from hormone treatment and the cause of recurrent disease, indicating the necessity of searching for targeted impacts just on these components of pathogenesis.

Keywords

adenomyosis
stem cells
Musashi-1
COX-2
Oct4

Supplementary Materials

  1. Fig. 1. Expression of Msh1 in the samples of nodular adenomyosis (a) in the phase of secretion of the menstrual cycle and in the endometrium cells in the phase of secretion (b). Immunopeoxidase method,  original magnification. a, b - 200.
  2. Fig. 2. Levels of COX-2 expression in epithelial and stromal cells of eutopic endometrium and in sites of nodular and diffuse adenomyosis.
  3. Fig. 3. COX-2 expression in samples of nodular adenomyosis (a) during the proliferation phase of the menstrual cycle and in the endometrial cells during the proliferation phase (b). Immunoperoxidase method, original magnification- a, b - 200.
  4. Fig. 4. Expression of OCT4 in samples of diffuse adenomyosis (a) during the proliferation of the menstrual cycle and in the endometrial cells during the proliferation phase (b). Immunoperoxidase method,  original magnification. a, b - 200.
  5. Fig. 5. Number (%) of OCT4 immunopositive cells in the eutopic endometrium and sites of nodular and diffuse adenomyosis.

References

1. Баскаков В.П., Цвелев Ю.В., Кира Е.Ф. Эндометриоидная болезнь. СПб.: Издательство Н-Л; 2002. 452с. [Baskakov V.P., Tsvelev Yu.V., Kira E.F. Endometriosis disease. St. Petersburg: Publishing House N-L; 2002. 452p. (in Russian)]

2. Адамян Л.В. Cочетанные доброкачественные опухоли и гиперпластичские процессы матки (миома, аденомиоз, гиперплазия эндометрия). Клинические рекомендаций по ведению больных. М.; 2015. 26с. [Adamyan L.V. Combined benign tumors and hyperplastic processes of the uterus (myoma, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia). Clinical recommendations for managing patients. Moscow; 2015. 26c. (in Russian)]

3. Brosens J.J., Barker F.G., de Souza N.M. Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum. Reprod. Update. 1998; 4(5): 496-502.

4. Gargett C.E., Nguyen H.P., Ye L. Endometrial regeneration and endometrial stem/progenitor cells. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2012; 13(4): 235-51. doi: 10.1007/s11154-012-9221-9.

5. Шкляр А.А., Адамян Л.В., Коган Е.А., Парамонова Н.Б., Козаченко И.Ф., Гаврилова Т.Ю., Кононов С.Н. Трудности диагностики узловой и диффузной форм аденомиоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2015; 3: 67-72. [Shklyar A.A., Adamyan L.V., Kogan E.A., Paramonova N.B., Kozachenko I.F., Gavrilova T.Yu., Kononov S.N. Difficulties in diagnosing nodular and diffuse adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 3: 67-72. (in Russian)]

6. Chen Y.Z., Wang J.H., Yan J., Liang Y., Zhang X.F., Zhou F. Increased expression of the adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 in the ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis does not correlate with serum estradiol and progesterone levels. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 173: 88-93.

7. Gargett C.E., Schwab K.E., Deane J.A. Endometrial stem/ progenitor cells: the first 10 years. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016; 22(2): 137-63.

8. Rogers P.A., D’Hooghe T.M., Fazleabas A., Gargett C.E., Giudice L.C., Montgomery G.W. et al. Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod. Sci. 2009; 16(4): 335-46.

9. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Wattiez A., Donnez J. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 98(3): 564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061.

10. Shklyar A.A., Adamyan L.V., Kogan E.A., Gavrilova T.Y., Kozachenko I.F. Receptivity of endometrioid heterotopias with nodular and diffuse forms of adenomyosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(6, Suppl.): S171. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.636.

11. Brunn J., Block U., Ruf G., Bos I., Kunze W.P., Scriba P.C. Volumetrie der Schilddrusenlappen mittels Realtime-Sonogrpahie. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 1981; 106(41): 1338-40.

12. Давыдов А.И., Пашков В.М., Шахламова М.Н. Аденомиоз: новый взгляд на старую проблему. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2016; 15(2): 59-66. [Davydov A.I., Pashkov V.M., Shakhlamova M.N. Adenomyosis: A new look at the old problem. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2016; 15 (2): 59-66 (in Russian)]

13. Götte M., Greve B., Kelsch R., Müller-Uthoff H., Weiss K., Kharabi Masouleh B. et al. The adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 modulates endometrial carcinoma cell cycle progression and apoptosis via Notch-1 and p21WAF1/CIP1. Int. J. Cancer. 2011; 129(8): 2042-9.

14. Gotte M., Wolf M., Staebler A., Buchweitz O., Kelsch R., Schuring A.N., Kiesel L. Increased expression of the adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 in endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2008; 215(3): 317-29.

15. Nguyen M.S., Voci S. Adenomyomatosis. Ultrasound Q. 2013; 29(3): 215-7.

16. Chang J.H., Au H.K., Lee W.C., Chi C.C., Ling T.Y., Wang L.M. et al. Expression of the pluripotent transcription factor OCT4 promotes cell migration in endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 99(5): 1332-9.

17. Proestling K., Birner P., Balendran S., Nirtl N., Marton E., Yerlikaya G. et al. Enhanced expression of the stemness-related factors OCT4, SOX15 and TWIST1 in ectopic endometrium of endometriosis patients. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2016; 14(1): 81.

18. Pacchiarotti A., Caserta D., Sbracia M., Moscarini M. Expression of oct-4 and c-kit antigens in endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95(3): 1171-3.

19. Au H.K., Chang J.H., Wu Y.C., Kuo Y.C., Chen Y.H., Lee W.C. et al. TGF-βI regulates cell migration through pluripotent transcription factor OCT4 in endometriosis. PLOS One. 2015; 10(12): e0145256.

20. Wang Y., Qu Y., Song W. Genetic variation in COX-2 -1195 and the risk of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 42(2): 168-72.

21. Chen C. COX-2’s new role in inflammation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010; 6(6): 401-2.

22. Chen Y.J., Li H.Y., Chang Y.L., Yuan C.C., Tai L.K., Lu K.H. et al. Suppression of migratory/invasive ability and induction of apoptosis in adenomyosis-derived mesenchymal stem cells by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94(6): 1972-9.

Received 16.06.2017

Accepted 23.06.2017

About the Authors

Dzhamalutdinova Kistaman Magomedzapirovna, post-graduate student of the Department of Operative Gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics,
Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +79168881210. E-mail: DK0590@mail.ru
Kozachenko Irena Feliksovna, Ph.D., Senior Researcher, Department of Operative Gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4
Shegolev Aleksandr Ivanovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Pathology and Anatomy Department, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4
Faizullina Nafisa Munavarovna, Ph.D., senior researcher of the pathoanatomical department, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +79164534087. E-mail: nafisa05@inbox.ru
Adamyan Leila Vladimirovna, MD, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director for Research and Head
of the Department of Operative Gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +74952223737. E-mail: Adamyanleila@gmail.com

For citations: Dzhamalutdinova K.M., Kozachenko I.F., Shchegolev A.I., Faizullina N.M., Adamyan L.V. Clinical and morphological features of nodular and diffuse adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; (9): 86-94. (in Russian)
http://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.9.86-94

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.